My Cart

Close
FDA Approved Dental Implants

ZERAMEX® XT

Root-Shaped Ceramic Implant with Internal Connection

Zeramex XT Dental Implants

Tapered * Screw-Retained * Internal Connection * 100% metal-free

Threaded Design

HIGH PRIMARY STABILITY

The thread design and
cylindrical-conical implant shape
achieve high primary stability.
The reservoir for bone grafs at the
tip of the implant simplifes implant
insertion.

Internal Connection

INTERNAL CONNECTION

The special geometry with the four tips enables high precision and fast and easy insertion and alignment of the abutment. The slightly beveled contact surface of the implant platform is designed to facilitate centering of the prosthetic components.

Vicarbo Screw

REDUCED DIAMETER VICARBO SCREW

One screw for two diameters. The XT Vicarbo Screw head diameter is a reduced 2.8mm. Length is 7.4mm and Tightening torque of 25Ncm.

Bio-compatible Tools

Biocompatible Tools

ZERADRILL™ Biocompatible reusable drills with
carbon coating. Precision designed for exacting geometry of the unique tapered shape.

VICARBO® TECHNOLOGY

XT Dental Implant System

 

The heart of the connection is the VICARBO® screw.

It works like a bolt, which anchors the abutment in the implant. The extremely hard ceramic is combined with a very stiff, carbon fibre-reinforced high-performance peek. In a way similar to reinforced concrete, the ceramic absorbs the compressive forces, while the VICARBO® screw counteracts tensile forces.

ZERAFIL

 

The ZERAFIL™ surface is a micro-structured implant surface that enables decisive osseointegration of the dental implants.

The success rate of ZERAMEX® ceramic implants with a ZERAFIL™ surface is between 96.7 and 98.5 percent, depending on the system, and bears witness to the decisive osseointegration thanks to the optimum surface structure.[1] The hydrophilic implant surface ZERAFIL™ is sandblasted and etched so that osteoblasts can grow directly up to the dental implant and firm adhesion to the implant surface is achieved.[4]

Zerafil

METAL FREE

 

The 100-percent metal-free ceramic implants closely approximate the natural tooth root in terms of aesthetics and function. They are well tolerated, are completely free of metallic corrosion, and conduct neither electricity nor heat. Titanium can release titanium ions, which accumulate in the surrounding soft tissue and can cause infammation.[5] Likewise, titanium’s resistance to corrosion can decrease due to surface bacteria.[14] The use of metal-free ceramic implants precludes these effects.  

Color Coding & Sizes

Zeramex XT Color Code
Zeramex XT Sizes

SPECIAL OFFER - FREE SURGICAL KIT

UPTO $2500 OFF

For more information, contact us at sales@zeramexusa.com

Special Offer - $700 OFF

Sold out
Special Offer - $700 OFF

Sold out
Special Offer - $2500 OFF

Sold out

References:

  1. Cosgarea R et al., Peri-implant soft tissue colour around titanium and zirconia abutments: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. Clinical Oral Implant Research 26, 2015 / 537–544.
  2. Kajiwara N et al., Soft tissue biological response to zirconia and metal implant abutments compared with natural tooth: Microcirculation Monitoring as a Novel Bioindicator., Implant Dentistry Volume 24, Number 1 2015.
  3. Derks J et al., Efectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri-implantitis. J Dent Res. 2016 Jan; 95(1):43-9.
  4. Wachi T et al., Release of titanium ions from an implant surface and their efect on cytokine production related to alveolar bone resorption. Toxicology. 2015 Jan 2; 327:1-9.
  5. Addison O et al., Do ‘passive’ medical titanium surfaces deteriorate in service in the absence of wear? J R Soc Interface. 2012 Nov 7; 9(76):3161-4.
  6. Derks J et al., Efectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss. J Dent Res. 2015 Mar; 94(3 Suppl):44S-51S.
  7. Oliva J et al., Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three diferent rough surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 MarApr;25(2):336-44.
  8. Manzano G et al., Comparison of clinical performance of zirconia implants and titanium implants in animal models: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):311-20.
  9. Jank S et al., Success Rate of Two-Piece Zirconia Implants: A Retrospective Statistical Analysis. Implant Dent. 2016 Feb 1.
  10. Cionca N, Two-piece zirconia implants supporting all-ceramic crowns: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr;26(4):413-8.
  11. Scarano A et al., Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol. 2004 Feb; 75(2):292-6.
  12. Canullo L et al., Distinguishing predictive profles for patient-based risk assessment and diagnostics of plaqueinduced, surgically and prosthetically triggered peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Nov 20.
  13. Chappuis V et al., Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium implants in the presence of multinucleated giant cells. CIDRR, 2015 Sept. 17.
  14. Sridhar S et al., In Vitro Investigation of the Efect of Oral Bacteria in the Surface Oxidation of Dental Implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e562-75.
  15. Invibio T-PB-PUR-E-0031-A (3/2013).
  16. Boyer R et al., Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, ASM International, 1994.
  17. Ermüdungstests nach ISO14801 [Fatigue test in compliance with IOS14801]; Report No. 16010106- D-CS of 03/31/2016 and Report No. 14070102-D-CS of 04/21/2015; Study director: Nicolas Graf; Spineserv GmbH &&Co. KG, Söfinger Strasse 100, D-89077 Ulm